Quantcast

Dupage Policy Journal

Wednesday, May 1, 2024

Miller: Mandate includes ‘at least one electric vehicle charging station for each residential unit’

245944138 239813648194161 4226298718002186128 n

EV charging port. | facebook.com/USDOT

EV charging port. | facebook.com/USDOT

Residents are highlighting a pair of bills critics say would result in wasteful spending for builders and homeowners. 

“A proposed House Bill 2206 and Senate Bill 40 require a new single-family residence or a small multifamily residence to have at least one electric vehicle charging station for each residential unit with dedicated parking,” Walter A. Miller Jr., a Bloomingdale resident, said on Facebook.

The legislation under consideration – House Bill 2206 and Senate Bill 40 – would mandate “a garage to have enough electric generating capacity in the garage to charge an electric vehicle.”

Critics are arguing the state government is penalizing builders and those forced to buy technology they may never use. "This is a mandate with no funding behind it, a mandate that every new house, single-family duplex, then it gets into the multi-family, would have to have electric car charging stations," Dean Graven of the Home Builders Association of Illinois said on WMAY. 

"For every $1,000 price increase on a home, you knock out 6,000 buyers," Graven said. "Legislators are not factoring the added costs in the legislation." 

He added that many homeowners do not need or want an electric vehicle charging port. 

"You could fish wires from the breaker box to whatever location … you need," Graven said. "This is a lot less expensive, and then if a consumer says 'I do not have one, I am never going to buy one, so I don’t have to spend any more money.’" 

Gov. J.B. Pritzker on 2021 Reimagining Electric Vehicles in Illinois Act which grants heavy subsidies to consumers who purchase electric vehicles. 

“The credits range from 75 percent to 100 percent of income tax withheld for creating new jobs or 25 percent to 50 percent for retained employees, depending on various factors such as company location,” the governor’s office said in a press release at the time. 

However, those funds – unlike those in the recent proposal – were outlined by the state government.

MORE NEWS