Village of Hinsdale Board of Trustees met Oct. 6.
Here is the minutes provided by the board:
The regularly scheduled meeting of the Hinsdale Village Board of Trustees (conducted electronically) was called to order by Village President Tom Cauley at 7:35 p.m., roll call was taken.
Present: President Tom Cauley
Participating by telephone: Trustees Matthew Posthuma, Scott Banke, Luke Stifflear, Gerald J. Hughes, Laurel Haarlow and Neale Byrnes
Absent: None
Participating by telephone: Village Manager Kathleen A. Gargano, Village Attorney Michael Marrs, Assistant Village Manager/Director of Public Safety Brad Bloom, Police Chief Brian King, Finance Director Darrell Langlois, Director of Community Development/Building Commissioner Robb McGinnis, Director of Public Services George Peluso, Village Engineer Dan Deeter, Village Planner Chan Yu, Superintendent of Parks & Recreation Heather Bereckis and Village Clerk Christine Bruton
VILLAGE PRESIDENT - INTRODUCTION
“Good evening. On September 18, 2020, Governor Pritzker entered the latest in a string of emergency declarations related to the COVID-19 pandemic. In light of that declaration, and consistent with various Executive Orders entered by the Governor, and the recent amendments made to the Open Meetings Act in Public Act 101-640, I find that it is not practical or prudent to conduct an in-person meeting. This Open Regular Meeting of the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Hinsdale is therefore being conducted remotely.
Public Act 101-640 allows public bodies to meet remotely during public health disasters, so long as the public is able to monitor the meeting, and certain other conditions are met. Public comment is permitted during the Citizen’s Petitions portions of the meeting. When we get to those portions of the meeting, I will ask persons wishing to make public comment to identify themselves. If anyone wishing to speak has difficulty connecting to the meeting with ZOOM, please call Assistant Village Manager Brad Bloom at 630.789.7007.”
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a) Regular Meeting of September 15, 2020
Following a correction to the draft minutes, Trustee Posthuma moved to approve the draft minutes of the regular meeting of September 15, 2020, as amended. Trustee Byrnes seconded the motion.
AYES: Trustees Posthuma, Banke, Stifflear, Hughes, Haarlow and Byrnes
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Motion carried.
VILLAGE PRESIDENT’S REPORT
President Cauley reported it is Fire Prevention Week through October 10. The open house is cancelled this year, but there is information and activities on the website, and the Fire Department Facebook page.
Halloween is on Saturday this year, and while the Village does not regulate trick-or-treating, the CDC safety guidelines can be found on the Village website, including a printable form residents can post to indicate participation.
The Village is working with local restaurants to continue outdoor dining. There is an item on the Board’s agenda tonight to extend outdoor dining until June 2021. Staff will inspect tents for compliance.
He reported COVID-19 positivity is reported at 5.5%, a slight increase.
CITIZENS’ PETITIONS
President Cauley asked that all those persons wishing to speak regarding the Institute of Basic Life Principles property hold their comments until that agenda item is introduced.
Ms. Debra Braselton, 5611 Lancewood Way, Naples, Florida, addressed the Board regarding the third major adjustment on the Land Rover property. She believes there are three problems with the agenda item: 1) according to code the item must be moved forward no later than 60 days, that time has passed; 2) there is no draft ordinance in the packet; 3) the matter should go back to the drawing board as there are implications to consider because the old Land Rover location has been vacated.
SECOND READING
(Item taken out of order)
Refer the application packet to the Plan Commission for a hearing and consideration of a map amendment and concurrent planned development concept plan by Ryan Companies, US Inc.; OR
Move to deny the map amendment and concurrent planned development concept plan by Ryan Companies, US Inc.
(First Reading – September 15, 2020)
Trustee Stifflear introduced the item that relates to the proposed development of the Institute of Basic Life Principles (IBLP) property. This application is for 32.5 acres of the 60 acres on the south side of the property, and the applicant is looking for a referral of the concept plan and a map amendment to the Plan Commission for public hearing. He reminded the Board that the purpose of a planned development concept plan is to review the basic scope and character of the entire proposed project before detailed engineering drawings and site plan. A referral does not bind the Village in any way.
President Cauley said he has spoken with many residents, and today spoke individually with Trustees. There is a lot of community interest and opposition to the project. He would recommend this application not be referred to Plan Commission, because people feel it is too dense and increased traffic on Adams is problematic. He agrees we can do better. He believes residents are generally ok with the use, and based on the Eve Assisted Living experience, traffic is minimal, most on off hours, and there is no impact on schools. This could be the right use for the IBLP property, but this proposal is too dense. He believes it would be a mistake given public concern to refer the matter to the Plan Commission. He stated many Trustees share these concerns. Although Ryan Companies has been sensitive to resident concerns, including a change in the façade, and the generous donation of wetlands, given the lack of support he sees no reason to refer. He added that residents would also like to see one overriding plan for the property, not piecemeal proposals, however, the Village cannot force the owner to do this. He reminded residents that another development could be more dense than what is proposed. He illustrated the impact of a permitted government office building at four stories and 50’ feet high. The Ryan proposal is only 39’ feet on the east side. The independent living units are all one story buildings, but single-family homes would use more acreage, could be three stories tall, and be visible from Ogden Avenue. He concluded there are some advantages to the Ryan proposal. It is fine to say we don’t want it, it is too big, etc., however, this is a coveted parcel, and it will get developed. He recommended working together for something that most everyone will like.
Trustee Banke agreed, and added his concerns about the impact on Village services, and possible serious pressure on EMT and hospital services. He also expressed concern about taking on the responsibility of a gift of a park that is a wetland. The Village has no experience with wetlands, and we should take a hard look at our capacity to take this on in terms of the breadth and pitfalls of responsibility.
Trustee Hughes agreed, and added there is some worry about what else could go in there, and it is appropriate to try to control that for the better. He stated he likes Ryan Companies relative to other developers; they have a positive working relationship with staff. He hopes we can keep working in the right direction relative to density and traffic; however, the developer might be frustrated shooting at a moving target. He appreciates the resident’s sentiments, but suggested figuring out what the target density and traffic might be to provide direction. Public safety impact is knowable by talking to others that provide those services. With respect to the park donation, recognize the Village asked for that, so we need to figure out the concerns, as well as what the other investments might be.
Trustee Posthuma agrees, he likes the senior living use, but the current proposal is too far off from what is acceptable to people. The facility is too big in terms of the size of building and the number of people.
Trustee Byrnes agrees, this is a large building, and larger than Ryan Companies other facilities. He is also worried about the traffic on Adams, and prefers the independent living homes be on the west side of Adams.
Trustee Haarlow agrees, the density is too high and the building is a massive gigantic long building. She suggested smaller or medium sized buildings instead of one big one would better fit in the neighborhood. Traffic needs to be looked at carefully; if you reduce the density, you reduce the traffic. She also wondered how much traffic would be rerouted to Spring Road. She feels the public benefit needs work, and it would behoove us all to figure out a way to look at the entire wetland, not piecemeal. She hopes for dialogue between the Board, the developer, and the owner to figure out a way to think about it so plans could be made in that manner.
Trustee Stifflear agrees, commenting this is part of a process, reminding everyone that the 55th and County Line project was a year long process. He noted emails and letters that refer to keeping properties zoned R2, but there is 7.6 acres zoned IB, and reminded all of what could be built as a matter of right. A government office or health care facility could result in 600-700 trips out of the building. That is initially why he thought this proposal might work. Less dense is better, and rather than saying no, he thinks it is ok to let the developer know what the target density and traffic numbers might be. He remarked that when Eve Assisted Living was proposed he was against it as he lives one block away, but has been pleasantly surprised at the low intensity of the use. Mr. Dave Erickson, Vice President of Real Estate Development for Ryan Companies US, Inc., thanked the Board, and recapped the process over the past nine months, stating he was before the Village Board twice in January when the matter was referred to the Plan Commission. Since then there have been Plan Commission meetings, an open house, and multiple conversations with neighbors resulting in many positive changes to the application. These include the reduction in the number of villas and a change in location, 12 acres open space, changed architecture, added traffic mitigation on Adams, increased setbacks, decreased height, increased parking, and no requirement for a text amendment for planned development minimum acreage. If the Village could provide direction, it would be helpful, and they would be happy to continue the process. They are conducting another open house on Monday, October 12, the details are on their website. They want to continue to hear from the community to find common ground, acknowledging they are not going to make every person happy, but he believes compromise and common ground is possible. He looks forward to continuing the conversation.
President Cauley said the emails are unanimous the project is too dense, and he is concerned about the Village providing guidance to a developer. He believes the best action is for Ryan Companies to reach out to the community, and come back with another proposal. Mr. Erickson said he is not asking for direction now, and will gather feedback from the community. Discussion followed regarding whether to vote on this item as a second reading, defer or withdraw. Village Attorney Michael Marrs stated the applicant would be prohibited from returning asking for essentially the same relief if a vote to deny is passed.
Mr. Erickson respectfully requested to withdraw this application.
Trustee Hughes addressed the notion of giving direction. The forum to provide clearer direction to a developer is the Plan Commission, and the forum for public input is the Plan Commission. He believes this matter will come back, and urged Trustees to clarify in their own minds what this might take, to remove the ambiguity. President Cauley does not want to give the developer advice, because he does not want the Board to be invested in the project. If it comes back to the Board, and is close to acceptable, to will go to the Plan Commission. Trustee Stifflear agreed, and pointed out this is a large tract of land in residents backyard, and the property is being marketed by national brokers. He recommended the leaders of the neighborhood group have discussions with Ryan Companies to get to some reasonable conclusion. He understands neighbors would like to leave the property as it is, but he believes it will be developed. He encouraged residents to speak with Ryan Companies; that is a way to provide a target. Trustee Hughes suggested if anyone has clearer thinking on what the target should be he would love to hear it.
Mr. Daniel Hemmer, 424 Glendale, provided a PowerPoint presentation to the Board on behalf of the Fullersburg Neighbors Association commenting on various aspects of the proposal just withdrawn by Ryan Companies. However, in response to President Cauley’s question about what might be acceptable, he said neighbors want something that fits in a residential neighborhood. Something comparable to the size of Manor Care might be acceptable. He also commented donating unusable land is not a public benefit, and referenced Eve Assisted Living having donated an ambulance to the Village. He also suggested dedicated access to Ogden Avenue. He mentioned concerns regarding flooding, and while the impact of COVID-19 might be gone, there would still be impact to the hospital. With respect to the building of a government building on the IB portion of the property, he said residents would be supportive of a government building if it served residents. He does not think the allowable IB height would be a problem if the bulk were less.
President Cauley encouraged the Fullersburg Neighbors group to meet with the developer or the owner to come up with parameters for development, to change the tenor of the discussion from opposition to what would be acceptable.
Mr. Eric Missil, 3 Cheval Drive, Oak Brook, made a PowerPoint presentation and believes the by right use of the property zoned IB is a scare tactic because of the prohibitive cost per square foot of the property. He said nothing bigger than the current building should be on that property. He thinks 25 single-family homes can be absorbed, but the flooding is the real issue. He recommended working with Oak Brook regarding shared infrastructure, and IBLP needs to come up with a master plan.
Mr. MarioTravelli, 521 Bonnie Brae Road, recommends the area zoned R2 be built that way, and maybe the area zoned IB can be changed to R2 if the owner requests it be rezoned. That would allow 10 homes to be built. He has concerns about a nursing home in that vicinity because he has done the calculations for people 65 and older, and concludes a nursing home is a death sentence until the COVID-19 threat disappears.
President Cauley said this application has been withdrawn, but hopefully some ideas will come out of the next developer meeting with the resident group. Trustee Stifflear encouraged residents to go through one voice to be most productive. President Cauley said he appreciates Mr. Erickson and the concessions that have been made, but the Board has to listen to residents. He hopes Ryan Companies will stay involved.
No action was taken on this matter.
FIRST READINGS – INTRODUCTION
Environment & Public Services (Chair Byrnes)
a) Approve a Resolution approving the 2020 Watermain Project Phase 1 Contract Change Order Number 2 in the amount of $184,031.85 to John Neri Construction Company, Inc.
Trustee Byrnes introduced the item that is a change order for the 2020 watermain project to replace a 98 year old water system. This was a quite difficult project since areas had not been touched in almost 100 years, and included public, private and abandoned utilities. Added costs could not be estimated. Costs include the restoration of the public right-of-way, patching street and pavement, curb and gutter, and parkway restoration. President Cauley said this is a 20% miss with the budget, but putting it in perspective, in 10 years of infrastructure work, the Village has been on budget or under. These issues could not have been anticipated. Discussion followed regarding the second phase of the project to commence next year.
Mr. Scott Creech, Village contractor from HR Green, added that in this case several unanticipated things came up, but will add additional cushion to next year’s budget estimate to include additional patching quantities, underground trenching backfill, and restoration quantities. He anticipates the second phase should be less problematic.
The Board agreed to move this item forward for a second reading at their next meeting.
Zoning & Public Safety (Chair Stifflear)
b) Approve an Ordinance approving an Exterior Appearance Plan for Façade Improvements – 16 East First Street
Trustee Stifflear introduced the item relating to façade changes for Nabuki, located in the historic downtown district. They are expanding to the space to the west and would like to match it to the existing restaurant. On September 9 the Plan Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval, subject to not painting the brick and feedback from the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC). Staff got feedback from HPC members, but the item has not formally gone to the Commission, however, they did not support the request. Trustee Stifflear referenced the illustrations included in the packet, and explained that a formal review by the HPC adds two months to the project timeline. He said the feedback so far from HPC is they “just don’t like it”. Discussion followed regarding HPC input. Trustee Haarlow thinks it is important to keep consistency on this building, because it is a contributing structure, and beautiful within our town. The only changes she would recommend are ones that could be undone, like paint and awnings; otherwise, we are chipping away at our historic downtown. Village Attorney Michael Marrs said the HPC could talk about this under new business, but they cannot take a vote. They can provide input that the Board can take under advisement. Mr. Peter Burdi, property owner, expressed confusion regarding the process as to why this is going to the Historic Preservation Commission when it has already been recommended by the Plan Commission, and is before the Village Board. He will make the recommended changes to the window and the color, but he needs the space in the building for additional seating. It was explained that the HPC will discuss the matter at their meeting tomorrow night as new business. This will not affect the timing, and no time will be lost.
Trustee Posthuma would like to see what the building originally looked like, wondering if we are preserving the original structure or a subsequent alteration. Trustee Banke recommended maintaining the visually pleasing symmetry of the building. The Board agreed to move this item forward for a second reading at their next meeting.
c) Approve an Ordinance Approving a Tentative Plat of Subdivision – 820 N. County Line Road
Trustee Stifflear introduced the item. The applicant has a lot 17,680’ square foot lot, and wants to subdivide to create two code compliant lots. He directed Trustees to the photos and survey of the property located in their packets. He noted this matter was unanimously recommended by the Plan Commission. It was confirmed that the existing house will be conforming on the new smaller lot.
The Board agreed to move this item forward for a second reading at their next meeting.
CONSENT AGENDA
Administration & Community Affairs (Chair Hughes)
a) Trustee Stifflear moved Approval and payment of the accounts payable for the period of September 14, 2020 through October 2, 2020, in the aggregate amount of $1,249,712.47 as set forth on the list provided by the Village Treasurer, of which a permanent copy is on file with the Village Clerk. Trustee Banke seconded the motion.
AYES: Trustees Posthuma, Banke, Stifflear, Hughes, Haarlow and Byrnes NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Motion carried.
Environment & Public Services (Chair Byrnes)
b) Award Bid #1674 to National Power Rodding Inc. in the amount of $45,739.40 and perform additional sewer cleaning, televising, and root cutting services not to exceed the budgeted amount of $60,000
President Cauley introduced this routine consent agenda item. Trustee Byrnes moved to Award Bid #1674 to National Power Rodding Inc. in the amount of $45,739.40 and perform additional sewer cleaning, televising, and root cutting services not to exceed the budgeted amount of $60,000. Trustee Banke seconded the motion.
AYES: Trustees Posthuma, Banke, Stifflear, Hughes, Haarlow and Byrnes NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Motion carried.
SECOND READINGS / NON-CONSENT AGENDA – ADOPTION
Administration & Community Affairs (Chair Hughes)
a) Approve an Ordinance Extending the Approval of Temporary Uses of Village Right-of Way and other Public and Private Spaces for Outdoor Dining, Retail and other Authorized Purposes to June 30, 2021
Trustee Hughes introduced the item that will extend outdoor dining from December 31, 2020 to June 30, 2021. The Board originally put a time limit on the authorization to see how it would go, it has been successful, and there is much interest in continuing the option. This is presented as a second reading to provide clarity to restaurant owners, and sufficient advance notice for planning. He added that any consideration to make this permanent would be discussed separately.
Trustee Hughes moved to Approve an Ordinance Extending the Approval of Temporary Uses of Village Right-of-Way and other Public and Private Spaces for Outdoor Dining, Retail and other Authorized Purposes to June 30, 2021. Trustee Byrnes seconded the motion.
AYES: Trustees Posthuma, Banke, Stifflear, Hughes, Haarlow and Byrnes NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Motion carried.
b) Approve an Ordinance Deleting Chapter 19 (Motor Fuel Tax) of Title 3 (Business and License Regulations) of the Village Code of Hinsdale and Discontinuing the Imposition of a Motor Fuel Tax within the Cook County Portion of the Village as Previously Imposed by Ordinances Nos. O2019-30 and O2020-19; OR
Approve an Ordinance Amending Title 3 (Business and License Regulations), Chapter 19 (Motor Fuel Tax) of the Village Code of Hinsdale Relative to the Motor Fuel Tax Trustee Hughes introduced the item that relates to motor fuel tax for Cook County. In October 2019, the Board considered an option newly created by Springfield whereby Hinsdale could levy up to $.03 cents additional tax on gasoline sales in Cook County. At that time, this included the Oasis, and would have the least impact on residents. This would not be applied at our DuPage County gas stations. Since then the Illinois Department of Revenue has determined that it’s not about the location of the gas retailer, and the Village needs to apply this to all gas stations equally, rather whether the municipality is located entirely or in part in Cook County. The Village can either repeal the tax effective January 2021, or continue with the tax as it is currently being collected, on all gas stations in both counties. This item appears as a second reading because of the State deadline to clean up the current ordinance.
This was originally going to be repealed, but he thinks there is a new decision, and the Board should discuss the two choices; 1) applying the tax to all gas stations; and 2) consideration of the fiscal situation of the Village following COVID-19 revenue impacts. Levying the tax on the Oasis results in $125,000 annually, but $300,000-$325,000 annually when applied to all gas stations. Trustee Hughes pointed out this directive can be changed in January or July, so this matter can be reconsidered at some time in the future, which he would advocate. He believes the Board should proceed with caution and certainty that it is a necessary tax, and to provide more notice for the public. He explained that staff is working with our representatives in Springfield for legislation to create the original option again, which might happen by spring.
Village Manager Gargano clarified that when the Village adopted the ordinance it only applied to Cook County, subsequently there was legislative change. The Village did not initially do anything contrary to the law. It was confirmed the tax is currently being collected from DuPage gas stations. President Cauley agrees once a tax is imposed it is hard to repeal. He recommends we repeal the ordinance and revisit in the summer. He is not comfortable passing a new tax on one reading. Trustee Banke agreed and confirmed the gas station on I-294 will remain in service. Trustee Byrnes confirmed the DuPage gas station owners did not know they would be paying this tax. Finance Director Darrell Langlois said this became apparent when they filed their tax returns and they called the Village. Village Attorney Michael Marrs said they did not start to collect the tax until July.
Trustee Posthuma agreed to defer, but since it is a new source of revenue, and related to people’s use of the roads, it might make sense in the future.
Trustee Hughes moved to approve to Approve an Ordinance Deleting Chapter 19 (Motor Fuel Tax) of Title 3 (Business and License Regulations) of the Village Code of Hinsdale and Discontinuing the Imposition of a Motor Fuel Tax within the Cook County Portion of the Village as Previously Imposed by Ordinances Nos. O2019-30 and O2020-19. Trustee Banke seconded the motion.
AYES: Trustees Posthuma, Banke, Stifflear, Hughes, Haarlow and Byrnes NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Motion carried.
Zoning & Public Safety (Chair Stifflear)
c) Approve or deny the request for a Third Major Adjustment to the Site Plan to permit approval of an access drive between 300 and 336 E. Ogden Avenue for the Land Rover/Jaguar dealership; OR
Refer the request to the Plan Commission for further hearing and review** (First Reading – September 1, 2020)
Trustee Stifflear introduced the item that would retroactively approve an access drive between the old Land Rover property and the new one. The applicant installed the drive without Village approval. The applicant has plans to sell used electric vehicles with an ancillary use of photography and detailing of Land Rover, Jaguar and electric vehicles at the old location. He noted this is an unusual request, but there is nothing in the code that prohibits the request. The Fire Department supports the drive as it provides access to the east side of building. The question is how many vehicles would be stored on the old property. The sales tax agreement requires Land Rover to completely vacate the building, to ensure the property is not used to store inventory. The Village asked for an agreement that caps the number of vehicles parked overnight at (5) five. There are 88 spaces available that could be used for the electric vehicle business. The applicant has resisted adding a number to the agreement.
Mr. Kevin Jacobs, owner, addressed the Board stating he believes his proposal will benefit the Village, and his businesses. He stated he wants a conclusion on this matter, and that he still and always intends 300 E. Ogden be used by Current Automotive for the selling of used electric vehicles. The Board’s approval or denial will not change the plan for 300 E. Ogden. He said the sales tax agreement already has provisions for this included, and the access drive keeps operations on private property and off area residential streets. They plan to continue with or without the drive, but he believes the drive will benefit the neighbors and provide better public safety. He has no plans for storage of Land Rover vehicles per the sales tax agreement.
President Cauley explained that when the sales tax agreement was negotiated, he didn’t want the old property to be used for storage, so that there could be two sales tax generating businesses. The drive makes him think the intention is storage. He noted that dealerships along Ogden Avenue often have large storage lots on contiguous lots. The best way to remedy the storage problem would be a limited number of cars allowed. He thinks in a year it will be storage. The only way to make sure is to put a number of cars in the agreement.
Trustee Stifflear believes a specified number in the agreement actually protects Mr. Jacobs and his business, because somebody might challenge any parking there in the future. Mr. Jacobs says he understands this, but the new dealership will generate sales tax, and believes a number puts undue restrictions for someone else. The sales tax agreement already has restrictions for parking for Land Rover. He said if the access drive is too much concern, they will move forward without it.
Mr. Scott Selfridge, representing Land Rover, said they could be servicing ten Land Rovers or Jaguars at a time, and voiced concern about limiting the number of parked cars when they don’t know what their future business need may be. President Cauley said he expected this to be an unrelated business.
Trustee Stifflear pointed out without the access drive a downside will be more traffic in the neighborhood as cars will go south on Oak Street around the block to the old Land Rover site. President Cauley reiterated his concerns about the site being used for excess parking because of the Land Rover proposal for the audio store on Ogden Avenue.
Director of Community Development Robb McGinnis said if this request is voted down, the blacktop will be removed and the area will be re-gravelled. Mr. Jacobs confirmed his intentions, and stated he cannot agree to a limit when the new business is still undefined, but he understands why this makes the Board nervous.
Trustee Stifflear moved to Deny the request for a Third Major Adjustment to the Site Plan to permit approval of an access drive between 300 and 336 E. Ogden Avenue for the Land Rover/Jaguar dealership. Trustee Banke seconded the motion.
AYES: Trustees Posthuma, Banke, Stifflear, Hughes, Haarlow and Byrnes NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Motion carried.
d) Refer the application packet to the Plan Commission for a hearing and consideration of a map amendment and concurrent planned development concept plan by Ryan Companies, US Inc.; OR
Move to deny the map amendment and concurrent planned development concept plan by Ryan Companies, US Inc.** (First Reading – September 15, 2020)
Item previously addressed.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
a) Tollway update
Mr. Bloom stated there is nothing new to report.
DEPARTMENT AND STAFF REPORTS
a) Parks & Recreation
b) Engineering
c) Fire
The report(s) listed above were provided to the Board. Trustee Hughes asked about the engineering report, specifically the burying of ComEd lines, noting this improves the aesthetics of the Village. If there is more being planned this is good news for the Village, and people should be made more aware. Director of Public Services George Peluso said the utility improvements are on line, but staff will continue to get the word out.
REPORTS FROM ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
None.
CITIZENS’ PETITIONS
None.
TRUSTEE COMMENTS
None.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the Board, President Cauley asked for a motion to adjourn. Trustee Hughes moved to adjourn the regularly scheduled meeting of the Hinsdale Village Board of Trustees of October 6, 2020. Trustee Byrnes seconded the motion.
AYES: Trustees Posthuma, Banke, Stifflear, Hughes, Haarlow and Byrnes NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Motion carried.
Meeting adjourned at 10:10 p.m.
https://cms4.revize.com/revize/hinsdaleil/document_center/VillageBoard/2020/10%20OCT/VBOT%2020%2010%2006%20minutes.pdf
Alerts Sign-up